![]() You can ask Activity Monitor to track other items within the View item in Menu bar, but we won't be looking at these today. You can click on any column to list items in order - that helps identify applications or processes munching memory, for example. User: OS X can be its own user for essential system processes - "root, while user-generated processes like using apps are denoted by Mac user name. PID: A number assigned to each process by the computer Idle Wake Ups: Number of times a process causes the system to execute a task Threads: How many instructions a process is running %CPU: How much processor power that process is using ĬPU Time: The length of time a process has been running Various active processes and applications are listed by name alongside the following: No time currently to run in anger on Yosemite but given another couple of weeks of stable WSAC (and other utilities) I probably will continue migrating my Mavericks production volume over to Yosemite and thus also test WSAC on that platform with more realworld usuage.The section beneath these controls provides you with more detailed perspective. Specifically while it's CPU resource can cap 100% at times then it reduces to below 60% (and falling) after 5-10minutes and circumstantially related tp whether a FULL/COMPLETE Scan has also been invoked? Previous as you've no doubt observed it would max both CPU cores for an hour (or more)! Start or continue disabling/reducing browser extentions,plugins, other anti malware/realtime monitors, and elaborate on Hardware/Software versions.įWIW, while I have a 10.10.2 test bed (looks like I need to upgrade to 10.10.3 + Apple security patches et al) I experienced the WSDaemon CPU issues initially on Mavericks 10.9.5 and earlier WSAC versions.Ĭurrently WSAC 8.0.8.38:277 with latest 10.9.5 patches hasn't yet reproduced the WSDaemon symptom on either of my MBP's again while incrementally restoring over last couple of months!. Only the two obvious things already mentioned earlier:Ģ. Maybe next year once WSA has become a bit more stable and mature on Mac I might switch wrote: I'm more than confident that eventually all will be sorted out, specially those issues which affect most users, however in the mean time I have decided to protect my mac with another security product. Lastly but not least important moving to Mavericks proved to be troublesome for WSA as previously dicussed. Support personnel informed me that the classification system had temporarly encountered technical difficulties and soon afterwards most of the previously restricted websites were now allowed (again this only happen in Safari browser). ![]() Having said that, WSA for Mac has been a bit troublesome for me, first there were some Safari add on issues which would not install properly on all users profiles, then apparently the classification system had a bit of trouble while filtering sites with Safari browser (even Webroot website was flagged as suspicious). I think WSA is one of the best security products for PC (I already purchased my license and plan on renewing), even more so because it can be used in combination with other security suites or products with no issues.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |